Jesus and john wayne country
While over 80% of white evangelicals voted for Trump and over 70% continue to support his presidency, progressive evangelicals have vociferously opposed him. This article analyzes the ways in which American evangelical Christians have responded to the presidential campaign and presidential administration of Donald Trump, with a particular focus on the faction of politically progressive evangelicals. Using a recent case study of how complementarian gender ideology became systematically inserted into one the most popular English Bible translations among evangelicals today, I illustrate how a more critical approach toward "the Bible" can provide richer, more sophisticated sociological analyses of power and cultural reproduction within Christian traditions. That is, sociologists should recognize that Bibles are multiform they are dynamic and their contents (not just their current interpretations) are highly contingent on temporal culture and power, being the product of manipulation by interpretive communities and actors with vested interests. I propose that rather than approaching "the Bible" through a distinctly Protestant lens, as given-specifically as uniform, static, and exogenous-sociologists should apply a critical lens to re-conceptualize the Bible more accurately. Sociologists whose research intersects with American Christianity recognize the critical importance of the Bible to understanding many Americans' beliefs, values, and behaviors, but their operative approach to the Bible generally ignores that "the Bible" is as much a product of interpretive communities as it is a symbolic marker of identity or shaper of social life.
![jesus and john wayne country jesus and john wayne country](https://i0.wp.com/pbs.twimg.com/media/CCeUTqUWgAA0CC0.jpg)
Both frames expand the power and reach of policing, limiting evangelicals’ abilities to see and correct problems within the profession. It argues that, in their entries into debates about law enforcement’s purpose in American life, evangelicals frame policing as both a divinely sanctioned activity and a site of sentimental engagement.
![jesus and john wayne country jesus and john wayne country](https://s3.amazonaws.com/mychurchwebsite/images/c6650/church_rq7pwe.jpg)
Drawing upon complementary interpretations of the “antistatist statist” nature of modern evangelicalism and the carceral state, this article offers a short history of modern evangelical understandings of law enforcement and an exploration of contemporary evangelical ministry to police officers. This article explores evangelical interest and influence in modern American policing. Though several powerful explorations of modern evangelical influence in American politics and culture have appeared in recent years (many of which illumine the seeming complications of evangelical influence in the Trump era), there is more work that needs to be done on the matter of evangelical understandings of and influence in American law enforcement. A link to a wide array of her talks on this overall topic/her book may be found here. Following is a webinar on this book with Kristin Kobes Du Mez done by Calvin University where she has taught since 2004. The Access Hollywood tape came out, white evangelical elites continued to defend Trump, his support among white evangelical voters remained strong, and I thought, "Ugh, I think I know what's going to happen and I think I know why." That's when I pulled some of that old research and wrote "Donald Trump and Militant Evangelical Masculinity." And then the book was published in 2020. However, just before the election, things clicked for me. As a Christian myself, I wanted to be careful about shining a bright light on this dark underbelly of American Christianity if it was merely a fringe phenomenon. For another, I wasn't sure at first how mainstream it all was. I wasn't sure that I wanted to live with that for the years that I knew it would take to write a book. For one, the things that I was uncovering were very depressing. In an interview with Religion & Politics, the author discusses how she came to its writing: Yes! Since about 2010, I had been giving talks on evangelicalism and masculinity and had been approached by publishers, but there were two things at that point that made me a little hesitant to dive into a book project. This is a highly disturbing-and informative-book.